The upper is also more strapped down than the Brooks, which is necessary with the bouncier midsole. Beyond that, youd derive similar benefits from either of these great options. Sam: Contrasting stability approaches with the GT having a firmer heel and contrasting softer, bouncier, thinner forefoot. Brooks Loft v3 nitrogen infused foam in the Launch would be wow and worth $120-$130 easily, with the somewhat dated BioMoGo DNA here what keeps the Launch 9 from really wowing me. It works. Its also lower to the ground, so even though its a bit bouncy, it feels better at faster paces. 
The Launch 8 is a more traditional, firmer ride, for daily miles. Sam: I certainly agree with Shannon on the durability aspects. The rest of the rubber is the same firmness all the way to the front, moderately firm and also not a soft blown rubber up front yet I do think compared to the prior rubber it may contribute to the slightly softer ride I feel. Smooth riding over a wide pace range Mike P/Renee, Extra stack is helpful - this shoe could go long (especially for lighter runners) Mike P/Renee/Sally/Sam, Nice, wide and stable forefoot landing area Mike P/Sam, GTS Guide Rails are not in the way of transition or over rigid/firm, a slight improvement over 8 for this neutral heel striker at slower paces Sam, The Green Rubber outsole is more sustainable being made of silica instead of petroleum Sam, Durable, versatile, comfortable and a great value at $110 Sam/Sally, Guide Rails (GTS) - can make rear feel stiff for mid/forefoot runners Mike P, Upper slightly insecure - but only at top end of pace range Mike P/Renee/Sally, Midsole not as responsive/exciting as other options Renee/Sally/Sam, Tongue slips way off center to the lateral side when running Sally, Launch 8 GTS: approx. The Rebel v2 was my favorite road shoe of 2021. I did notice on this version, I did not have to utilize the second eyelet when lacing up to secure the heel, rather, the heel stayed snugly and securely put. Similar comp as with the Topo Magnifly (see above). Where the Rincon slightly outdoes the Launch however, is with its incredibly smooth ride, characteristic to Hoka. The Launch upper is better constructed, while the Atreyu upper doesnt do much for you. You get a bit more cushion underfoot with the Launch, which is noticeable after the Atreyu packs in a little. There is good volume all around - I didnt feel any pressure points. The red is slightly less dense/ more open than the more orange/yellow mesh color, even at the toe box where it is intermittent, as the yellow dots and all the more orange areas are actually an additional thin layer of sewn in mesh, and thus thicker. Atreyu is much lighter, and works better for workout-level paces. Read on, my friends. I find it wraps the foot well without feeling constricting. For any type of speed work, adjusting the fit with those additional eyelets is helpful. I tend to heel strike at slower paces. Up front, I really enjoyed the wide, well protected, and smooth forefoot landing area. More to come, read on. The Brooks would do much better in that department (especially for forefoot runners). Not a problem per say but there. Ride: 8.7 (50%) Fit: 9.3 (30%) Value: 9.5 (15%) Style: 9.3 (5%). As I said before, this is one quiet, smoothly riding shoe. Renee (Non GTS): I reviewed the Launch 8 (non GTS previous version), and found it surprisingly versatile. It wrapped the foot well and securely, but didnt inhibit any motion of the foot. It seems like the stack has been increased, but the forefoot cushioning still feels really good to me. I prefer the nimble, lighter ride of the Launch 9, but prefer the Velocitys midsole for faster paces. The only reason for a 9.5 rather than a 10 is thatthe Glycerin 19 is still my golden child of a shoe and while this is awesome, it hasnt quite ascended that high on the pedestal. This said the midsole is more of a firmer responsive traditional kind than the new fangled rebound and bounce from say Pumas Nitro or New Balances Fuel Cell. Its also lower to the ground, so even though its a bit bouncy, it feels better at faster paces. For speed and tempo work, the Rebel v2 is better. Perhaps its the stable landing at the front, plus the overall geometry of the shoe, but I dont have the feeling that my heel is jacked up too high. It also feels soft, which is a good match to the feel of the midsole. I ran some gravel and uneven terrain, and despite the 10mm drop, the ride was comfortable and stable. As far as the GTS it is fine by me although not my preference as the regular is lighter yet and the full Green Rubber outsole all by itself provides some noticeable stability in the mix. I tend to like lower drop shoes because I run on uneven surfaces, yet despite the drop, the Launch 9 runs well on gravel. The tongue has 2 bars of thicker padding that run top to bottom - they protect very well from any lace bite. Brooks managed to let us have our cake and eat it too with their addition of more cushioning yet keeping things lightweight. Ultimately, I found the shoe worked best at paces just below workout-level, so the tradeoff for comfort at more moderate paces is welcomed. RoadTrail Run has affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on products purchased through affiliate linksin this article. Mike P (10.0): Seemingly similar shoes, but also different. It handles all paces well but leans faster paced daily training and shorter distances for me. Buttery Smooth & Versatile! I recommend it for long runs all the way up to paces just below workout level. I beat my previous pair of Brooks Launch to smithereens, I loved them so much. 10 Comparisons. Shannon (GTS): Normally I run in the neutral version of the Launch, but I found the Launch GTS arrived in its stead. When combined with the 10mm drop I flow smoothly forward here without interference but with a touch of support. I wore a womens 8 in both of these. The new Green rubber works well for the Launch and has a sustainability benefit.. Its full coverage, but well segmented so it doesnt restrict flexibility. Ride, Fit, and Style are solid across the board. Renee: The Revel 5 is another budget/well-priced daily trainer at $100. Thanks. Mike P (9.5): The NB FuelCell foam is a more modern, bouncy, and responsive foam. I had V1. Overall I feel the stack really extends the range of the shoe into long run territory - especially for lighter runners. The upper is a new Creel Wrap mesh while underfoot we get a more sustainable (silica based vs petroleum based) new Green Rubber outsole. While not as bouncy or super lightweight as other shoes, the Launch still has a touch of response which makes running at all paces pretty fun. It was clearly an improvement over earlier shoes with the tech as the GuideRails were co molded or of the same foam as in the 9 and not glued in (and stiff as a result) as in early GTS shoes, an approach along with Nikes Infinity Run rails I really didnt like. Even in the lightweight trainer category? Especially during some turns I didnt feel as locked in as I would like. I found the GT-2000s stability feature to be comfortable for a runner who prefers neutral shoes. Mike P (GTS) GTS seems to be one of those things where those that need it are either already aware of it, or at least curious about trying a shoe with some motion control. The Brooks has a more regular running shoe feel, while the Saucony seems to both bounce and propel you forward. The relative light weight and general comfort of the Launch 8 made it a great casual and running shoe, and all at a low price of $100. It handles all paces well but leans faster paced daily training and shorter distances for me. Quick Strides: RTR Team Testing Notes, Race Reports and More! Just for context - Im a forefoot/midfoot striker. It seems like the stack has been increased, but the forefoot cushioning still feels really good to me. Both are great values for the price. Look, if you love one, youre probably going to love the other. Mike P (10.0): The Endo Speed also features a more modern, bouncy, and responsive foam, in addition to the Speedroll technology. NB forefoot protection is not as good - its not a pick for me for longer runs. Id pick the Launch, but the Atreyu is not a bad shoe if it works for you. The Launch is a traditional 10mm drop daily run trainer that has been a long time favorite on the lighter, less cushioned, more agile end of the category. This is one smooth-riding, cushioned, responsive shoe, all in a lightweight package! The upper material itself is quite comfortable. This extra couple mm of material have not made this shoe feel bulkier or heavier ( and in fact it is lighter in weight), but we still derive the benefit of just a smidgeon of additional cushioning. But if you love a lightweight, do-it-all shoe, Launch 9 can be the answer for you! While I dont normally like high drop shoes, the 10mm Launch 9 is not polarizing. The obvious distinguishing feature for the GTS version is the Guide Rails. 
Seriously, what shoe is even $110 anymore?! Renee: I found the GT-2000s stability feature to be comfortable for a runner who prefers neutral shoes. With the stack height and weight loss, the Launch 9 is the better running shoe, although I enjoy the Revel 5 for casual wear and daily usage too. The Launch 8 is a more traditional, firmer ride, for daily miles. So to that end, its a great value to a great update. Mike P (9.5): Magnifly 4 is one of my favorite shoes, and I continue to use it for daily mileage. Not to worry though as thats the beauty of Brooks Guide Rail system: they can still accommodate a neutral runner and without overcorrecting, unlike the medial posts of yore. I would definitely recommend visiting your local running shop if you feel that Guide Rails may work for you. For $10 to $20 more, a runner could pay for a more responsive shoe, but those super trainers dont always have good outsole coverage. Like the previous version, the Launch 9 does not feel like a 10mm shoe. I loved it in that there are no uncomfortable seams or overlays. Not to worry though as thats the beauty of Brooks Guide Rail system: they can still accommodate a neutral runner and without overcorrecting, unlike the medial posts of yore. While there is no gusset, and for most non super fast paces none is needed, as the mesh and Brooks logo overlays do a great job holding the foot. I would not take the UA out on a long run. Pick the Launch, and use the $50 you save towards a dedicated speed day shoe. But then on heel touch-down, the rails gave a jarring sensation which I felt was quite restrictive. Heel cushion is solid. The Launch 9 is a lighter shoe, and the non GTS Launch 9 is much more nimble than the Velocity 2. Mike P (9.5): Similar comp as with the Topo Magnifly (see above). Mike P (10.0): I had V1. The only reason for a 9.5 rather than a 10 is thatthe Glycerin 19 is still my golden child of a shoe and while this is awesome, it hasnt quite ascended that high on the pedestal. At 8.68 oz / 246 g in a men's US9 the GTS 9is almost 0.5 oz lighter than the GTS 8 and has 2mm more stack height of BioMoGo DNA foam to come in at about 36mm heel, 26 mm forefoot. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. ST-4 has less cushion so I use it for shorter runs as well as casual use. The Brooks would do much better in that department (especially for forefoot runners). While I felt that this somewhat reduced the overall flexibility of the midfoot, it definitely served to give this shoe a super-stable feel upon landing. Shannon: Ah, two of my favorites head-to-head. The UA has a much more locked down upper, and firmer ride which I found more suited to faster running. I wore a womens size 8 in both. These partnerships do not influence our editorial content. I really like both shoes. I can see it moving around a bit more if you tend to keep your lacing a bit looser. Like Mike, I found the upper comfortable. Its strange that 7 versions later, they have the same kind of feel to me. The Launch 9 is a lighter shoe, and the non GTS Launch 9 is much more nimble than the Velocity 2. a very respectable weight for such a decently stacked, full rubber coverage outsole trainer. On one of my faster test runs at tempo pace (<6:00/mi), I noticed the upper didnt feel as tight as Id prefer for that type of running. 
- Fluffy Tulle Dress Short
- Julabo Shaking Water Bath
- Battletech Desert Map Pack
- Snowboard Pants Men's
- Care Bear Makeup Collection
- Liquitex Basics Acrylic Paint Set, 12
- Open Cuff Wedding Band
- Creamy White Floral Perfume
- Home Depot Black Faucet Kitchen
- Goetze Caramel Cream Ingredients
- Everpure Filtration System
- Boucheron Quatre Black
- Essentials Nylon Track Pants
- Mrs Meyers Lemon Verbena Fabric Softener
- Ibanez Acoustic Guitar